Why E-Style?

[manofsparrow]

Originally Posted by Mr.Lucifer

When you do less, you do it better.

Doing it better doesn't really nullify the fact that you do less.

[Odin5]

Throwing this out there (Again) so people don't get confused:

Originally Posted by Odin5

Here is the part people get me confused on the most:

I did NOT say that I only E-Style. I have always said that I E-Style/Hybrid. There is NO possible way for me ever to do as good as I did without using at least SOME glitching. The farthest I ever went in terms of my actual gameplay was Half-Step because my strategies never required anything higher than that, although I could do Reload Half Step, Triple Butterfly, etc.

[Daryth]

E style > you.
GG. winner winner chicken dinner!

But seriously. If I could, I would go back to e style and not k style at all. But its hard for me to revert. Therefore, becoming a hybrid is alot more fun

[Sesshomurony]

I asked my bro about his reason for E-styling. He said its because everything else is too hard.

[Vincent]

Originally Posted by Mr.Lucifer

Games are about having fun

qft.

Why else would you play a game?

-Vince

[STM1993]

Originally Posted by Grey

No, E-Style anything but fun. E-Stylers don't have fun when opponents don't die when they clearly are supposed to.

Here's the thing. Mobility. It might seem like aim is the most important thing in GunZ. No, mobility is. Because of this ping rigmarole, aiming and leading is DIFFICULT and LABORIOUS. I am tired of out-moving, out-witting, and out-aiming an opponent all at the same time and still getting killed... just because he was able to move around faster and outlast me.

Exactly, K-Stylers (and D-Stylers) have the same arsenal of techniques as E-Stylers, plus their glitches.

It's hardly relaxing when a player who has a clear advantage gloats over killing an E-Styler. It's hardly relaxing when one's main method of killing is so unreliable.

I can safely say you're a competitive player from how you type. E-Style is inferior to all the glitches in GunZ in terms of everything, that's true.

Fun? Well anyway, everyone can have fun, one way or another. Some define fun in a game as simply lots of chatting and laughing no whining etc, others may define it as owning your opponent. So I'm not surprised to see people disagree with me in this area.

The reason why I said "relaxing", is because for "E-Styling", it doesn't rely on you having to keep mashing keys quickly. It's just doing things the easy way, though not necessarily the most efficient. For some, even those key mashing is easy as pie, but for some players they may find it a bit tedious.



Just to clear things up a bit.

[Dicey]

K-style is all you need really the other styles are just for 'fun'.

[manofsparrow]

Originally Posted by Vincent

qft.

Why else would you play a game?

-Vince

To be like this guy.

[STM1993]

Play games for three reasons:

1. Fun
2. Competitions
3. It's your occupation

[Odin5]

Originally Posted by STM1993

even those key mashing is easy as pie,

Mmm...Pie.

[Char]

Originally Posted by Vincent

qft.

Why else would you play a game?

-Vince

People think that playing to win != having fun.

[Grey]

I do try to have fun by using guns only in games. Hell, I expect to be beaten silly by K-Stylers. But... I only expect that whenever I perform an action in GunZ, I get an opposite reaction. As in, when I shoot and lead well enough, my opponent dies. Is that so much to ask?

(It is, in GunZ)

[Kalizer]

What is E-Style? can someone tell me?

[STM1993]

Basically just playing the normal way without using glitches like K-Style etc.

[Daryth]

Why estyle? Cuz I kill 10x more people than I do with kstyle. Pro aim ftw?