Should they lower porno star age

[Dioshi]

Why would they, if the girls want to have sex when they are 14 its ok but to film it and post it on the internet or make a movie about it and sell it in shops is just sick sorry but i dont have the need to see 14year old girls having sex besides it would only attract pedophiles. AND the girls are still in school (well i hope for them they are) and if it comes out that they played in a pornographic film well i guess their lives are over. So i'd say dont lower it to 14!!

[Dakantos]

I agree that is should be kept 18+ for porn, but i find it interesting that girls can have sex with someone within a 4 year range, and its not considered rape. Also that here in iowa you can get married at 14 with parents consent, 16 without. I do find it odd you can get married at 14, but you can't be in porn, or drink, or smoke, etc.

"While the phrase age of consent typically does not appear in legal statutes,[1] when used with reference to criminal law the age of consent is the minimum age at which a person is considered to be capable of legally giving informed consent to any contract or behaviour regulated by law with another person. This article refers specifically to those laws regulating sexual acts. This should not be confused with the age of majority, age of criminal responsibility, or the marriageable age.

The age of consent varies widely from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.[1] The median seems to range from 16 to 18 years, but laws stating ages ranging from 12 to 21 do exist. In many jurisdictions, age of consent is interpreted to mean mental or functional age.[2] As a result, victims can be of any chronological age if their mental age is below the age of consent.[3] Some jurisdictions forbid sexual activity outside of legal marriage completely. The relevant age may also vary by the type of sexual act, the sex of the actors, or other restrictions such as abuse of a position of trust. Some jurisdictions may also make allowances for minors engaged in sexual acts with each other, rather than a hard and fast single age. Charges resulting from a breach of these laws may range from a relatively low-level misdemeanor such as "corruption of a minor," to "statutory rape" (which is considered equivalent to rape, both in severity and sentencing)."

can range anywhere from 12~21. How is it that they can give consent to marriage, but not sexual acts?


I'm not advocating lowering the age for porn, im trying to make a point that it needs to be uniform. They should be raising the age of marriage.

[Xzero]

I sense pedo in this thread.

Age of consent in Canada is 14. I don't want to see prepubescent kids in porn movies.

[Chokichi]

there is a pron clip of a 15 year old going around my school atm -_- she is 15 and she made the vid herself without anyone else in the room just her stripping and masturbating.

imo that is fine .. she wanted to do it.. there is no male .

in the studio getting ass raped by a man at 14-15 is sick.

[Colby]

Not at all, I think girls are not able to properly decide whether they should sell their bodies to the internet. Teenage pregnancy is already a problem, this would only provoke that. I think if anything, Porn should be exclusively adults, and that there should be a mandatory intelligence and maturity test to make sure they are responsible enough to make those kinds of decisions.

[XxWorfxX]

Originally Posted by Steelste

Well, I don't know how serious this will be.

Anyway, do you think they should lower the legal age limit to appear in pornography to 14+? I personally wouldn't care because my interests lay somewhere else.


Anyway when I'd say as long as the individual knew what they were doing they should be able to do it.

No, I'm not talking about like 30+ on a 14-17 year old person especially not rape.

As long as its consensual and not forced what would be wrong with it?

/Discuss

+/-rep me freely for this thread.

It does not really matter! They can make older girls look pretty damn young with computers (don't forget lolicon!). Though heck, if a 14 year old wants to make some cash by showing off what God gave her, who's to stop her? It's her fcking body!

[.sq]

Originally Posted by XxWorfxX

It does not really matter! They can make older girls look pretty damn young with computers (don't forget lolicon!). Though heck, if a 14 year old wants to make some cash by showing off what God gave her, who's to stop her? It's her fcking body!

Too young to understand.

[XxWorfxX]

Originally Posted by .sq

Too young to understand.

You generalize people too much. Besides we are all too "young" for half the crap we do with our lives. Regrets honey, you gotta live with em.

[Colby]

Originally Posted by XxWorfxX

It does not really matter! They can make older girls look pretty damn young with computers (don't forget lolicon!). Though heck, if a 14 year old wants to make some cash by showing off what God gave her, who's to stop her? It's her fcking body!

I see, so you're in favor of raising the rates of teen pregnancy? Don't forget, every new teen pregnant is potentially a life ruined, another person in the gutter. We're already overflowing with people who's lives are ruined.

[Ailysa]

A bit selfish to want child pornography, just for your needs as a juvenile kid. It's not fair for a 14 year old kid to go through that ****. She doesn't know what she's getting herself into and will not be aware of the troubles she can and will go through as a result.

[Mr.Lucifer]

Originally Posted by XxWorfxX

It does not really matter! They can make older girls look pretty damn young with computers (don't forget lolicon!). Though heck, if a 14 year old wants to make some cash by showing off what God gave her, who's to stop her? It's her fcking body!

Manipulation is a crime. According to your logic the victim is the only criminal when religious extremists exploited them in a weak moment of their life and made them commit murder.

[imasero]

Originally Posted by Steelste

Well, I don't know how serious this will be.

Anyway, do you think they should lower the legal age limit to appear in pornography to 14+? I personally wouldn't care because my interests lay somewhere else.


Anyway when I'd say as long as the individual knew what they were doing they should be able to do it.

No, I'm not talking about like 30+ on a 14-17 year old person especially not rape.

As long as its consensual and not forced what would be wrong with it?

/Discuss

+/-rep me freely for this thread.

That's pretty ****ed up. That's like asking would you like to see your daughter having a high risk chance of losing her virginity before she's 18. No man would want to see their daughter in a porn video. If i had one and i caught her doing stupid **** like that i would slit her throat.

[4head]

Hmmm i guess its what ever floats your boat really, but i think its reasonable were it is, lowering it would verge on paedphilia

[Colby]

Originally Posted by imasero

That's pretty ****ed up. That's like asking would you like to see your daughter having a high risk chance of losing her virginity before she's 18. No man would want to see their daughter in a porn video. If i had one and i caught her doing stupid **** like that i would slit her throat.

Because murder solves everything. That will teach her to star in porn films.

[An Amateur]

No, if anything they should raise it.

You might get more discussion over lowering the veiwing age. I'm for that one.