Create your own Conspiracy Theory

[Bao]

The game is simple, you post a random word and the person that posts next will create a conspiracy theory about it.

I'll start off :

Pen

Pen is the prefix of Penis, which is part of the male reproductive system, if you take the word Penis and read it backwards its Sinep, which sounds like "Snip" and if you put them both together its Sinep Penis, which means they're gonna snip all the male's penis!!! OMG ITS THE APOCOLYPSE!


Next Word:
Pistol

[JinDaYi]

Pistol was actually meant to be a whip cream until a random wigger came out from the shadows of his mother's mini van and yelled "don't maekz me pull out mah pistahlz!" while pointing his finger in a "L" shape manner to symbolize how much of a loser their opposer was. This was overheard by a crack addict and he had the concept patented and then later formed the rap group "Tech9".

True story.
----

Rice.

[waterbuster]

Rice. Rice was the fourth unknown factor to WW2, and four is the amount of kingdoms in the bible during the rapture. The fourth kingdom is italy, where pizza is made, and pizza is made of flower, and flower is the name of the top-secret nuclear bomb fallout shelter.

---------------------------------------

DNA

[JinDaYi]

DNA is actually a concept developed by PETA to label animals as valid beings.

Except rats because they become gay to prevent massive reproduction in various circumstances. Which means, according to PETA, gay people don't have DNA.
----

Chicken.

[Schisma]

JinDaYi is a genetically enhanced chicken created by PETA to prove that chickens are people too. He was then released on GZF to test his intelligence and social skills.
-------
Hotdog

[Colby]

Originally Posted by Schisma

JinDaYi is a genetically enhanced chicken created by PETA to prove that chickens are people too. He was then released on GZF to test his intelligence and social skills.
-------
Hotdog

Used as a term to define the governments conspiracy to light dogs on fire and throw them at Japanese people back in 1942, this idea however was overshadowed by the nuclear bomb, the tolls nessacery for the project still exist though and the government is considering this for the Iraq war.

[salshshot]

^wheres ur word =[
-------------
Blah

[Colby]

Oh I forgot, next word is....


Radishes

[Bao]

Radishes actually are dishes as you can see the word DISHES in RaDISHES.

Next Word:
Boom

[Turokcalde]

The collapse of the World Trade Center was a surprise to the engineering community. While no skyscraper had ever before completely collapsed due to fire or other local damage, three skyscrapers collapsed on September 11, 2001. The challenge for engineers was then to explain how the local damage caused by the airplanes (or, in the case of WTC 7, falling debris) was able to occasion a global progressive collapse. After an intensive three-year investigation, the National Institute of Standards and Technology published an account that has been largely accepted in the engineering community. The official collapse mechanism refers only to the aircraft impacts and the subsequent fires, which are taken to have caused sufficient structural damage to occasion the collapses. Conspiracy theorists emphasize that the only precedents for global collapse before 9/11 are controlled demolitions, and demand a more thorough investigation of this possibility.[51][52]

The controlled demolition hypothesis plays a central, albeit not essential, role in the 9/11 conspiracy theories.[53] Jeff King and Jim Hoffman were early defenders of the controlled demolition hypothesis and published their observations online.[54] David Ray Griffin included the theory in his book The New Pearl Harbor. It received its most notable proponent to date in early 2006, when Steven E. Jones, a physicist at Brigham Young University, argued that a "gravity driven collapse" without demolition charges would defy the laws of physics.[55]

There is a range of opinion about the most likely sort and amount of explosives, the way they were distributed, and how they were successfully brought into the building. Some conspiracy theorists propose a regular controlled demolition, in which the role of the demolition charges would have been to remove the main structural supports in order to let gravity and the weight of the building do the rest. Steven Jones believes that thermite (thermate), perhaps in combination with other devices, was likely involved. Critics often argue that the difficulty of preparing the building for demolition without being noticed makes controlled demolition implausible. Proponents sometimes cite reports of what they believe are unusual power outages, maintenance work and emergency drills in the weeks leading up to September 11 2001.

There is widespread agreement, however, about the significance of the controlled demolition hypothesis, even among those who don't endorse it specifically or conspiracy theories in general. The necessary devices could only have been planted well in advance of the September 11 attacks and would have required extraordinary access to three highly secured buildings.


Building Seven
Conspiracy theorists frequently emphasise the collapse of Seven World Trade Center in discussing the controlled demolition theory. They cite several reasons for this. First, they believe the collapse displayed especially clear features of a controlled demolition. Second, they say that since no plane hit the building, its collapse is even more difficult to explain than that of the two towers. Flaming debris did fall onto the building as a result of the collapse of the twin towers, but World Trade Center buildings 4, 5 and 6 remained standing despite also being severely damaged.[56] Third, researchers emphasise the style in which WTC7 collapsed: according to conspiracy theorists the collapse took 7 seconds, with constant acceleration close to gravitional.[57] (FEMA described the collapse sequence as lasting 37 seconds, basing this on seismic evidence and videos of the roof of the building;[58] 9/11 researchers analyse video footages that show only the sudden collapse of the outer walls and refer to similiarity with typical controlled demolitions[59]) Fourth, in a PBS documentary on the collapse, Larry Silverstein, the owner of the building, said the fire department had decided to "pull it".[60] Although his spokesperson later said Silverstein meant that firefighters had decided to withdraw from the building and the surrounding area for their own safety,[61] many conspiracy theorists insist that "pull it" is technical slang in the demolition industry for demolish a building. (Whether or not this is what the phrase means has become a point of dispute.)[62] The official investigation into the collapse is still ongoing (a draft of the NIST report will be released in early 2007). NIST said they had to prioritize their investigations and chose to investigate the collapse of WTC buildings 1 and 2 first, and then building 7.[52] The fact that the building housed the offices of government agencies like the CIA,[63] the FBI, and the SEC, along with the City of New York's emergency command bunker has also fueled conspiracy theories.


Mini-Nukes or Energy Weapons
A small number of theorists -- James W. Walter, Judy Wood, Morgan Reynolds and James H. Fetzer -- believe that the widespread damage and eventual collapse of the Twin Towers was caused by a "mini-nuke" or energy weapon. Since the resignation of Steven E. Jones, Kevin Ryan and others from the Scholars for 9/11 Truth group, James Fetzer has broadened its scope to encourage the consideration of these theories, and has endorsed the exploration of the possible use of mini-nukes, directed energy weapons, and even of HAARP for this purpose. Among these theories is one first proposed by Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood.[64] Researchers Steven E. Jones and Jim Hoffman have published refutations to claims that "nukes" were used[65][66] and Jones has questioned whether the space weapon theories are even testable.[67]


Pentagon not hit by an airplane
See also: American Airlines Flight 77

Security camera footage showing American Airlines Flight 77 (far right) just before impact.
The Pentagon, after collapse of the damaged section.Claims that the Pentagon was hit by something significantly smaller than a Boeing 757 (typically a missile or smaller aircraft) have been raised by some conspiracy theorists based on photographs in which there appears to be a lack of expected debris or pieces of a commercial aircraft within the immediate impact area, and what some believe is a lack of damage to the building and the lawn. The first person to suggest that a missile hit the Pentagon was Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld in an interview on October 12, 2001, which helped set up this claim. Subsequently, Thierry Meyssan in his book 9/11: The Big Lie gave this claim much more visibility. He also advanced the idea with his website Hunt the Boeing![68] and the popular internet videos Loose Change and "911 In Plane Site". A likely cause of these ideas, some say, was the initial scarcity of documentation of the attack. At first the only evidence available consisted of long distance photographs and video footage[69] taken after the attack, eyewitness testimony from individuals at the scene, and five video frames captured by a security camera which were released on March 8, 2002. A large amount of evidence was later released after the Zacarias Moussaoui trial and several Freedom of Information Act requests...

Suspicions were additionally fueled by a lack of video footage of the impact of the jetliner, since many assume that the Pentagon must be subject to intense camera surveillance for security reasons. In addition to the Pentagon's own security cameras, these people also noted that security camera footage from a nearby Citgo gas station and from the Virginia Department of Transportation was swiftly confiscated by the US government. On May 16, 2006 the security camera footage was released as part of a Judicial Watch's FOIA request.[70][71] However, due to a low number of frames per second, the videos do not clearly show the impact of the plane, only the approach of the plane (at an angle) and the explosion cloud, thus keeping the "no Boeing" theory popular. In addition to the security cam footage, the Citgo footage was released on September 15, 2006, but did not show the attacks.[72] The Doubletree hotel, located nearby in Crystal City, Virginia, also had a security camera video, and on December 4, 2006 the FBI released the video in response to a freedom of information lawsuit filed by Scott Bingham.[73][74] No plane can be seen entering the Pentagon since the camera was mounted on a lower point on the Doubletree Hotel and an elevated highway obstructs the view of the Pentagon.[75][76]

A few fringe conspiracy theorists also consider American Airlines Flight 77 pilot Charles Burlingame as a "prime suspect" in the conspiracy.[77][78] In response to these accusations and the Loose Change video, his sister, Debra, remarked "The only thing they (the filmmakers) seem to have gotten right about the Sept. 11 attacks is the date when they occurred...They aren't truth-tellers looking to save the world. They're con artists hoping to sucker conspiracy-theory paranoids or anti-government malcontents into shelling out their hard-earned dollars."[79]

The Pentagon "no Boeing" theory constitutes a controversial issue, even among conspiracy theorists, many of whom have pointed out that this claim is disproven by hundreds of eyewitnesses and physical evidence, suggesting it is disinformation to create a easily discredited straw man argument.[80][81][82] Several researchers have argued that the wings would cause less damage than the plane's main body, that photographs of large amounts of wreckage and debris matching a 757 have become available, that the appearance of the size of the hole is typically misrepresented; and that the actual fuselage diameter of 12 feet is a much more relevant dimension for the deepest parts of the hole than the overall 44-foot height of the 757's tail.[83][84] They also emphasize reports from numerous eyewitnesses, including commuters on nearby roads,[85] nearby apartment buildings,[86] and other surrounding locations.

[XypherFoX]

Oh god, plagiarism!

[BabyLocRback]

WHERE"S YOUR WORD??????
______________________
Noob

[Admiral Awesome (115 votes)]

next word is

chilly

[Colby]

Chilly was rumored to be gone, but has reincarnated as roflmywaffle.

[Admiral Awesome (115 votes)]

next ?