[Whist]

No winning has nothing to do with it.
But not doing the same thing every game does.

Quit making assumptions about how I play. Seriously how many times must I explain my self.
I already said I play in 10-20 man games (not per team, 10-20 total players in each game)
I used 2fort as an example because it seemed the easiest to explain common things that always happen, not to mention I can't place the other map names I remember with the actual map (I didn't pay that much attention to remember if granery was the one with 2 capture points or 3).

ANyways, just because I don't metion every map doesn't mean I don't play them.
I've logged plenty of hours into the game. I know how to play it. I know what I'm doing.
I don't care if I win, as long as I'm having fun IN the game, the outcome does not matter.

It seems you try to argue your points by making stupid assumptions and twisting what I say to make it seem like I have no idea about anything except what I've specifically stated I do.

I have over 60 hours logged into the game when I add up my class play times.
Yeah sure, you can argue I'm not a pro...I'm not entering any tournaments obviously. But I shouldn't have to to actually enjoy the game.
I'll argue my point like you for a second...you're basically telling me I have to be a pro at the game to truely enjoy it. That's assinine.

The only reason I have 60 hours is I'd keep playing it when I had nothing better to do, but I always got bored of it after the first hour.

I think the addition of more weapons is a good idea, except for the fact that i have to do a ton of stupid tasks that are near impossible to do. Thus making me again dislike something they've done with the game.

Its just not good as a whole. There are little things they could tweak and change that would make it more fun...but when ever they get a good idea, like implanting different weapons...they **** it up by doing stuff like linking them to insane achievements.